Since I'm in the US on travel, I get to see all these TV commercials for a whole bunch of drugs. Drugs that claim to provide relief against the entire spectrum of malaises that afflict mankind. Starting from your springtime allergies, nasal congestion, restless leg syndrome and such including a set of others related to bodily functions and conditions that we will not list here in order to retain this blog's PG-13 rating. These ads are not creatively spectacular - shots of happy looking people in a green meadow walking slowly into a sunset, a middle aged lady looking out a window on a grey day and petting a cat, a 50 something couple sitting down for dinner, etc. (sometimes these folks are out of focus) while the voiceover outlines the benefits of the magic pill. And the disclaimer. It is the disclaimer part that never fails to catch my attention.
"This is not suitable for everyone. Don't take this if you are using nitrates for a heart condition. This drug is known to cause swelling of the throat, bleeding of the upper mouth, skin rashes, slight dizziness, confusion, lowering of skills and the ability to focus. In rare cases this formula can cause a liver condition that can sometimes become fatal... "And so on and so forth.
May be I'm wrong here, but don't the symptoms appear the same as that for rat poison? Excuse me if I sound rude, but is nasal congestion that bad compared to a potentially fatal condition? Really folks? When you are dead, what value does a clear nasal passage provide?
People at the funeral might go "Poor guy. His liver ruptured and the spleen haemorrhaged. The lungs melted away and his skin fell off. But the nose? The doctor confirmed that the nose was as clean as a whistle. No congestion whatsoever..."
Should such a lethal concoction even be allowed to be manufactured or sold to the public? Much less, advertised on prime time television?
These disclaimers finish with the mandatory "Talk to your doctor if is right for you" part. Yeah right. Honey, no offense, but I don't think I need a doctor to tell me that this drug is not right but downright lethal. And, in the event that the doctor does say this is right for me, he'll have to pin me to the ground and force feed it down my throat. If you ask me, a more appropriate disclaimer would be "Keep out of reach of children. Wash your hands thoroughly when you come in contact. Contact your doctor immediately if accidentally ingested." with a smiling skull and crossed bones in red.
And since I'm on this, might as well touch upon the devilish disclaimer's first cousin: the stupid statutory warning. It really annoys me when the "Smoking/drinking is injurious to health" comes up when someone lights up on screen. Perhaps the research results indicate that such a message has some positive effect, although I seriously doubt it.
The other day for example, I saw two "bad guys" on TV plotting two kill someone off. In an effort to get into character and showcase their meanness as they were discussing the merits of the methods at their disposal, they were both drinking and drawing on cigarettes. The flashing statutory warning below read: "kudi kudiyai kedukkum. pugai pidithal naattukkum veettukkum kedu." etc.. [Standard statutory warning message in Tamil.]
The guys were plotting to kill someone for Godssakes! The message that I get is: Hey if you want to nuke some place, I'm actually fine. Here, take some nuclear fuel, here is the detonator, a city map and keys to my pick-up truck. May I suggest the train station or the city center? Have fun! But...put out that cigarette please. No smoking, that's not on. Really.
On an aside, how would you rather like your villain to be? A clean shaven, well manicured, smartly dressed, green tea drinking, hybrid car driving, 9-5 job villain that knocks on the guy's door before shooting him in the face? And then even calls The Hindu obituary to inform that his victim slept in the Lord? At Rs. 100+ for the tickets, the bad guy better look evil, brew his liquor and roll his own cigarettes!
And compared to some of the stuff that gets beamed on TV, you are better off lighting up or may be even getting drunk. Which is exactly why I propose this message instead:
Dear parent, if smoking and drinking are the only things your kid picks up after watching this fellow/lady (in the case of mega serials, you know), believe me, you can be proud that you've raised a good one!
And that, boys and girls, is what I'd call sensible statutory warning.
* What's a post on disclaimers without a disclaimer of its own? Although, all I want to say is: thanks for reading and come back.
HAHAHA! Super True
ReplyDeleteGood one:) Reminds me of a post I read somewhere on the A/U certification for a film with a warning stating that children over a certain age need parental guidance!
ReplyDeleteAnon: Thanks.
ReplyDeleteVidya: Thanks. Wonder what kind of guidance a parent can give in a cinema hall without getting shushed by the others.